 |
LITIGATION SUPPORT
Harper Strategies offers comprehensive paralegal support services for complex employment law litigation including:
- Document Review
- Case Evaluation and Liability Analysis
- Legal Research
- Discovery Plans
- Interrogatory Drafting
- Development of Requests for Production of Documents and Things
- Drafting Requests for Admission of Facts
- Exhibit Preparation
- Deposition Transcript Indexing
PARTIAL LIST OF PUBLISHED COURT DECISIONS
77 Mich. App. 361, 258 N.W.2d 227, Michigan Court of Appeals (1977)
Stimson v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company
547 F. Supp. 1067, W.D. Mich. (1982)
Chamberlain v. Bissell, Inc.
553 F. Supp. 532, E.D. Mich. (1982)
Graves v. University of Michigan
682 F.Supp.901, E.D. Mich. (1987)
Brown v. UAW
703 F. Supp. 40, E. D. Mich. (1988)
Vineyard v. Ford Motor Company and UAW
886 F.2d 766, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (1989)
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, et al., v. State of Michigan, et al.
929 F.2d 1105, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (1989)
Kenneth L. Ryan, v. General Motors Corporation, United Auto Workers and United Auto Workers Local 735
922 F.2d 287, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (1990)
Leland F. Welch v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Motor Division; Local 599, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, (UAW)
976 F.2d 1185, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (1992)
Seniority Research Group v. Chrysler Motor Corporation; International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America-UAW; and United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America-U.S.A., Local 110
782 F. Supp. 347, E.D. Mich. (1992)
242 F.3d 837, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (1993)
8 F.3d 376, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (1993)
Leo LaPointe v. United Autoworkers Local 600, and Doug Thompson
787 F.Supp. 117, E.D. Mich. (1992)
Murray v. Ford Motor Company and UAW
984 F.2d 244, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (1993)
Dan L. Blount v. Local Union 25, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW; General Motors Corporation
239 Mich. App. 538, Michigan Court of Appeals (2000)
Murad v. UAW Professional and Administrative Union Local 1979
242 F.3d 837,United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (2001)
John E. Scott, Sr.; Denise D. Clark, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW Union), Local Union 879, a Labor Organization, Defendant/Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8613, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (2002)
William Washington v. Ford Motor Company and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers Of America
176 F. Supp. 2d 719, W.D. Ky (2001)
___ F.2d ____, 109 Fed. Appx. 718; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18069; 175 L.R.R.M. 2896 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (2004)
Joyce Frazier, et al., Plaintiffs, James Jefferson, Roosevelt Roberts, and Barbara Steadmon v. Ford Motor Company; Local 862, International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; and Kenny Yates
|